I was selected for jury duty for the month of March. Over the years, two other times I had received that letter in the mail, which everyone dreads, but the trials throughout those months were canceled. Not so lucky this time.
I had to appear at the courthouse not just once, but twice last month. And this is how it went, in case you've never had the experience, or if they do it differently where you live.
First, all of us prospective jurors (about 40 to 45 people) waited for over a half
an hour sitting on the most uncomfortable benches in the larger courtroom. I'm
sure that the prosecution and the defense were trying a last-ditch effort to
settle out of court. No such luck, either time I was there.
Finally, they ushered us into one of the smaller courtrooms, gave us a few
instructions, and then read off the names of the 23 people chosen at random to
move to the jury box.
The judge asked them a bunch of questions, such as whether they knew the
accused or any of the witnesses who would be called, or if they had any strong
feelings about what the defendant was charged with. It was a very long process,
since whenever anyone raised their hand to answer "yes" to a
question, they had to explain why. If the judge released them based on their
answers, the clerk of courts would randomly pick another name from those still
in the back of the room. And then the judge would have to ask them if they
would have answered "yes" to any of the questions he had already
asked.
When the judge finished his questioning, the prosecuting attorney and then the
defense attorney asked all their questions. They couldn't release anyone at
that point – only the judge could – but they made notes on who they believed
would be biased and who would be more likely to vote on their side (or so I
imagine).
After they were done with that, the two attorneys passed lists of their chosen
jurors back and forth until they agreed on who would go home and who would be
stuck in the juror's box. Someone read off the thirteen names (twelve, plus a
spare in case someone got sick or something), and everyone else went home.
I don't know. Does that sound convoluted to you? Couldn't they streamline the
process to make it easier on everyone?
In the end, though, since I was released from both trials, it only took up
three hours of my life, and I got paid mileage.
But, wow, what would have been the verdict in Jesus' trial if this had been how
they did things back then? Except we know that God's plan from the beginning
was for His Son to be sacrificed for our sins.
13 Pilate called the people together with the leading priests and the rulers. 14 He said to them, “You brought this man to me, saying he makes trouble among the people. But I have questioned him before you all, and I have not found him guilty of what you say. 15 Also, Herod found nothing wrong with him; he sent him back to us. Look, he has done nothing for which he should die. 16 So, after I punish him, I will let him go free.” [17 Every year at the Passover Feast, Pilate had to release one prisoner to the people.]
18 But the people shouted together, “Take this man away! Let Barabbas go free!” 19 (Barabbas was a man who was in prison for his part in a riot in the city and for murder.)
20 Pilate wanted to let Jesus go free and told this to the crowd. 21 But they shouted again, “Crucify him! Crucify him!”
22 A third time Pilate said to them, “Why? What wrong has he done? I can find no reason to kill him. So I will have him punished and set him free.”
23 But they continued to shout, demanding that Jesus be crucified. Their yelling became so loud that 24 Pilate decided to give them what they wanted. (Luke 23:13-24, New Century Version)










