Here’s one of my posts where I dredge up what I learned in
high school civics class. Yes, I verified things on the internet, but I surprisingly
retained the gist of the matter.
When our Founding Fathers began building the foundations of our
government one of the things they wanted to be sure of was that there would be
a system of checks and balances so that we never fell into the clutches of a
dictatorship. Or worse.
The three branches of government in the US are, of course, the
Legislative, the Executive and the Judicial. The Legislative Branch is
Congress, made up of the House of Representatives and Senate. Their duty is to
make the laws. The Executive Branch is the president, vice president, Cabinet, and
most of the federal agencies. They are tasked with enforcing the laws. The
Judicial Branch, or the Supreme Court, interprets the laws. Or that’s how it
was all set up.
When I think of the two branches that are not the Supreme Court,
I usually don’t see them dealing so much with the laws. Sometimes, honestly, I’m
not sure what they are doing most of the time. Arguing, it seems like, if you
follow the media. But I digress.
Of course, as you know, the American people elect the
president and the members of Congress. Each state has only two representatives
in the Senate, but the members of the House from each state is based on the population
of each state. Sort of another system of checks and balances, a way to ensure
each state has a reasonably equal voice in Congress.
No matter what all these people are doing, or how they got
there, none of them is supposed to have ultimate power. For example, both
houses of Congress must vote to enact laws, the president can veto those laws, and the Supreme Court can rule laws unconstitutional. Congress can override
presidential vetoes and can also impeach and remove the president or a member
of the Supreme Court.
Here’s the example on everyone’s mind right now. As you all
know, one of our long-term Supreme Court justices passed away last week. The president
has the duty to nominate her replacement, but that replacement needs to be
approved by the Senate. In these days, where all that seems to matter in
Washington is what political party you belong to – well – hard telling what
will happen. It just makes me question if those checks and balances that our
Founding Fathers instituted really work out so well anymore.
Which brings up the bigger question. Why do we have political
parties? And why basically only two? George Washington hadn’t belonged to any political
party and he had hoped they wouldn’t be formed, fearing they would only breed
conflict and stagnation. Wow! What a smart man.
I don’t know. This is where my thought process hits a snag
or where all the fuses in my brain burn out. I guess I will have to save this
for next time – my thoughts on what our two political parties stand for. And a whole lot of controversy.
No comments:
Post a Comment